Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

Keeping you current on OHS Laws and Developments in Canada.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

  • Home
  • About Us

SCC upholds employer’s “no free accident” alcohol and drug policy: Stewart v Elk Valley

By April Kosten
June 19, 2017
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Safety Professionals - Practice Issues
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

On June 15, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corp. (2017 SCC 30). This is a landmark decision, reinforcing the right of employers to take proactive risk mitigation and management measures through alcohol and drug policies to ensure workplace safety.

In this case, Ian Stewart (“Stewart”) worked in a safety-sensitive mine operated by the Elk Valley Coal Corporation, Cardinal River Operations (“Elk Valley”). The employer implemented an alcohol and drug policy, which among other things, required employees to disclose addiction issues before any alcohol or drug-related incident occurred (“Policy”). Employees who self-disclosed would be offered treatment. Employees who failed to self-disclose in advance of an incident and subsequently tested positive for alcohol or drugs, could be terminated.

Read the full article

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
April Kosten

About April Kosten

April Kosten is a partner in the Employment & Labour Group in the Calgary office. Her practice focuses on management side labour, employment, human rights, administrative and privacy law.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Caselaw Developments
  • Violence and Harassment

Student’s violent outbursts justified teacher’s work refusal: OLRB

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Violence and Harassment

Drunken Picket Line Threat to “Shoot Everyone” Did Not Warrant Dismissal: Ontario Arbitrator

A mining employee who consumed alcohol and uttered threats on a picket line was not properly dismissed, as his threats […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Violence and Harassment

Federal employee has effective veto over appointment of “impartial” workplace violence investigator, as long as veto not exercised in “abusive” manner: Tribunal

By Adrian Miedema

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Caselaw Developments
  • COVID-19
  • General
  • Government Safety Investigations
  • International Standards
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Other Safety Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges
  • Safety – Risk Management
  • Safety Professionals – Practice Issues
  • Violence and Harassment

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site