Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

Keeping you current on OHS Laws and Developments in Canada.

open menu close menu

Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

  • Home
  • About Us

WSIB fraud requires a wilful act, like tax evasion, appeal court decides

By Adrian Miedema
November 15, 2018
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Safety Professionals - Practice Issues
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The WSIB must prove that a worker intended to obtain WSIB benefits to which he or she was not entitled, when it charges a worker with “wilfully failing to inform the Board of a material change”, the Ontario Court of Appeal has decided.

The WSIB prosecuted three workers, who were receiving WSIB benefits, for failing to report a “material change” with respect to their entitlement to WSIB benefits.  The WSIB argued that it was not required to prove that the workers intended to defraud the WSIB.  The appeal court disagreed.  It held that in order to obtain a conviction for failing to report a material change, the prosecutor must prove something akin to tax evasion or fraud.  The court said that the WSIB must prove the following:

1. The accused knew that a material change in his or her health, income, employment status or other circumstance had occurred. Material change means a change that could affect his or her entitlement to benefits paid by the WSIB;

2. The accused intended not to inform the WSIB of that change; and

3.The accused:

a.  intended by the failure to inform, to receive benefits to which he or she was not entitled, or

b.  foresaw that the failure to inform was substantially certain to result in the receipt of benefits to which he or she was not entitled.

With respect to one of the three workers, whose first language was not English and who may not have understood his obligations, the appeal court held that the prosecutor had not proven the necessary intent.  As such, his charge was dismissed. 

The other two workers, who were found guilty at trial, were awarded a new trial as the trial justice’s decision did not contain sufficient detail to permit the court to determine whether the workers had the necessary intent to receive WSIB benefits to which they were not entitled.  

The decision is somewhat of a setback for the WSIB in prosecuting workers for “WSIB fraud”, as it will often be difficult for the WSIB to prove that a worker intended not to inform the WSIB of a material change and intended to receive benefits to which he or she was not entitled.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board v. Curtis, 2018 ONCA 441 (CanLII)

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Adrian Miedema

About Adrian Miedema

Adrian is a partner in the Toronto Employment group of Dentons Canada LLP. He advises and represents public- and private-sector employers in employment, health and safety and human rights matters. He appears before employment tribunals and all levels of the Ontario courts on behalf of employers. He also advises employers on strategic and risk management considerations in employment policy and contracts.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Caselaw Developments
  • Safety Professionals - Practice Issues

Employer may set “terms of reference” for health and safety committee, arbitration board rules

Employers have the power to set terms of reference for the administration and operation of joint health and safety committees, […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges

Company owner convicted, fined under OHSA for failing to co-operate with MOL inspector

A widely-reported fire at a Kingston construction site that required the evacuation of a crane operator by helicopter, has resulted […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Safety - Risk Management

Employer ordered to reinstate labourer fired day after complaining about knee pain, safety issue

An employee has won a reinstatement order under the Occupational Health and Safety Act after the Ontario Labour Relations Board held that […]

By Adrian Miedema

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Caselaw Developments
  • COVID-19
  • General
  • Government Safety Investigations
  • International Standards
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Other Safety Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges
  • Safety – Risk Management
  • Safety Professionals – Practice Issues
  • Violence and Harassment

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site