Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

Keeping you current on OHS Laws and Developments in Canada.

open menu close menu

Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

  • Home
  • About Us

OHSA charges in fatality case dismissed for delay. Crown did not have “concrete plan” to move case along

By Adrian Miedema
July 5, 2018
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

An Ontario appeal judge has upheld the dismissal of Occupational Health and Safety Act charges against employees due to delay.

The charges resulted from the death of a mining employee from cyanide intoxication by way of skin absorption.  The company itself had pleaded guilty to criminal negligence charges, after which all fifteen OHSA charges against the company were withdrawn. Criminal charges against one of the employees were withdrawn at the same time.

The total delay in this case, from the laying of the charges until the last day scheduled for trial, was 21 months, which exceeded the 18-month presumptive delay ceiling set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Jordan case. 

The trial judge found that the Ministry of Labour prosecutor had breached his duty to develop and follow a concrete plan to minimize the delay due to the complexity of the case. Also, it was not reasonable for the prosecutor to fail to seek trial dates until 5 1/2 months before the 18-month “presumptive ceiling” for delay. Further there was no effort by the prosecutor until late in the case, to seek to narrow the issues or shorten the trial by seeking admissions, attempting to negotiate an agreed statement of facts, or seeking agreement regarding documents, despite being invited by the defence to do so. The trial judge therefore concluded that the prosecutor’s trial management fell well below the standard set out in the Jordan, and the appeal judge upheld that finding.

In the result, the appeal judge upheld the trial judge’s decision to stay the charges against the employees for delay, bringing the prosecution to an end – despite the fact that the charges were particularly serious as they resulted from a fatality.

R. v. Nugent, Guillemette and Buckingham, 2018 ONSC 3546 (CanLII)

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Adrian Miedema

About Adrian Miedema

Adrian is a partner in the Toronto Employment group of Dentons Canada LLP. He advises and represents public- and private-sector employers in employment, health and safety and human rights matters. He appears before employment tribunals and all levels of the Ontario courts on behalf of employers. He also advises employers on strategic and risk management considerations in employment policy and contracts.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges

Cell Phone Driving Law Interpreted: Any “Holding” is Illegal, says Ontario Court

An Ontario appeal court has decided that any “holding” of a cell phone is illegal under Ontario’s relatively new cell […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Safety - Risk Management

Employer’s request for post-incident alcohol and drug test was not justified where no sign of impairment: arbitrator

An employee responsible for a minor, although unusual, accident in a company parking lot was justified in refusing to submit […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Government Safety Investigations
  • Safety Professionals - Practice Issues
  • Violence and Harassment

MOL Inspector’s “Unclear” Order Required School Board to Revise its Workplace Violence Policy

A Ministry of Labour inspector has ordered an Ontario school board to revise its workplace violence policy, and the Ontario […]

By Adrian Miedema

About Dentons

Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your organization by providing uniquely global and deeply local legal solutions. Polycentric, purpose-driven and committed to inclusion, diversity, equity and sustainability, we focus on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Caselaw Developments
  • COVID-19
  • General
  • Government Safety Investigations
  • International Standards
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Other Safety Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges
  • Safety – Risk Management
  • Safety Professionals – Practice Issues
  • Violence and Harassment

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site