Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

Keeping you current on OHS Laws and Developments in Canada.

open menu close menu

Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

  • Home
  • About Us

Ninety-day administrative driving suspension for impaired driving was not just cause to fire Assistant Fire Chief

By Adrian Miedema
September 19, 2018
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Safety - Risk Management
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

An Assistant Fire Chief has won his wrongful dismissal suit after he was fired following a 90-day administrative driving prohibition for impaired driving while off-duty.

The Assistant Fire Chief was on the way home from a “date night” with his spouse when he was pulled over for suspected impaired driving.  He failed two roadside breathalyzer tests and received the administrative driving suspension. He immediately advised the Fire Department and was distraught and remorseful. 

Although the Fire Chief and human resources advisor advised against firing, and a number of firefighters signed a letter asking that the Assistant Fire Chief not be fired, the fire department’s Chief Administrative Officer was adamant and went ahead and dismissed him. 

The court held that the fire department did not have just cause for dismissal.  The Assistant Fire Chief was off-duty and he was not representing the fire department at the time.  While the truck he was driving belonged to the fire department, it was not marked as such.  There was no public knowledge of his administrative driving prohibition.  His conduct was not of the same “moral reprehensibility” as in other cases where employees’ off-duty conduct was just cause for dismissal.  The Assistant Fire Chief was not the public face of the fire department.  The other career firefighters in the fire department had not lost confidence in him.  There was no criminal charge, but rather he received a 90-day driving suspension.  In conclusion, the court decided that his off-duty conduct was not incompatible with the faithful discharge of his duties or otherwise prejudicial to the interests or reputation of the fire department. 

In the end, the court awarded the employee five months’ salary as provided for in his employment contract.

Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), 2018 BCSC 124 (CanLII)

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Adrian Miedema

About Adrian Miedema

Adrian is a partner in the Toronto Employment group of Dentons Canada LLP. He advises and represents public- and private-sector employers in employment, health and safety and human rights matters. He appears before employment tribunals and all levels of the Ontario courts on behalf of employers. He also advises employers on strategic and risk management considerations in employment policy and contracts.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Caselaw Developments

HRTO sets protocol for employers to use their own occupational health and claims management file to defend human rights complaint

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has set out criteria that an employer must satisfy in order to use its […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Violence and Harassment

Employee properly fired for workplace violence threats, despite his mental disability: Appeal Court

An employee’s mental disability, unknown to his employer at the time of dismissal, played no role in the reason he […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Caselaw Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges

Court should be careful not to measure the practices of “smaller concerns” against those of large companies with far more resources, Justice of the Peace says in dismissing OHSA charge given due diligence

By Adrian Miedema

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Caselaw Developments
  • COVID-19
  • General
  • Government Safety Investigations
  • International Standards
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Other Safety Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges
  • Safety – Risk Management
  • Safety Professionals – Practice Issues
  • Violence and Harassment

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site