Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

Keeping you current on OHS Laws and Developments in Canada.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canadian Occupational Health & Safety Law

  • Home
  • About Us

B.C. bans employers’ mandatory high heels policies in some workplaces: amendments to footwear regulations now in effect

By Jeff Bastien
May 11, 2017
  • Amendments to Safety Laws
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

On April 7, 2017, the British Columbia government amended the footwear regulation under the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, BC Reg 296/97 (the “Regulation”) to specify that employers cannot require a worker to wear footwear that is not of a design, construction, and material appropriate to the protection required, or which does not allow the worker to safely perform his or her work.  The driving force behind this amendment was largely to address health and safety issues arising in hospitality workplaces such as restaurants and bars where employers required employees to wear high heels.

Section 8.22 of the Regulation already required footwear to be of a design, construction, and material appropriate to the protection required. The amendment adds that the footwear must allow the worker to safely perform the worker’s work, and introduces the following elements:

  • The addition of “tripping” and the “potential for musculoskeletal injury” to the list of factors in Section 8.22(2) which must be considered when determining the appropriate protection required of footwear; and
  • A provision prohibiting employers from requiring that workers wear footwear which does not comply with the requirements of appropriate design, construction, and material, or which does not allow the worker to safely perform work (Section 8.22(2.1)).The guideline indicates that the Regulation is not intended to interfere with a worker’s choice of footwear if there are no hazards of foot or ankle injury or potential for musculoskeletal injury. A risk assessment should be made to determine what constitutes appropriate footwear in the context of an employee’s particular duties and workplace, taking into account all of the factors in Section 8.22(2).The guideline has been released initially as a “Preliminary Issue” and will remain marked as such for a 60-day period during which time the public may provide comments to WorkSafeBC.
  • Although the guideline specifically addresses high heels, the amendments to the Regulation are not limited to high heels. The additions to Section 8.22 apply to all types of footwear and any employer dress codes or requirements with respect to footwear.
  • On April 28, 2017, WorkSafeBC introduced a new guideline “G.8.22(2.1) High heels” to assist in the interpretation and application of Section 8.22(2.1). The guideline suggests that high heels – given their lack of ankle protection and foot support – would not be appropriate footwear for hospitality workers who walk on different surfaces, including slippery surfaces and stairs, often while carrying food and drinks, such that they are exposed to hazards such as slipping, tripping, uneven terrain, and the potential for musculoskeletal injury.  A dress code requiring these workers to wear high heels would contravene the Regulation.
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Jeff Bastien

About Jeff Bastien

As a member of Vancouver’s labour and employment group and litigation and dispute resolution group, Jeff Bastien is uniquely positioned to advise clients on a multitude of issues facing the modern business.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Other Safety Developments

Mandatory Worker Safety Training Materials, Safety Poster, Released by Ontario MOL for Consultation

The Ontario Ministry of Labour has announced that it intends to pass a regulation that will introduce a mandatory safety awareness […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Caselaw Developments

Bill 168 Update: OLRB Will Not Hear Harassment-Reprisal Complaint Under OHSA

In previous posts, we reported that the Ontario Labour Relations Board had expressed doubt about whether it has jurisdiction to […]

By Adrian Miedema
  • Amendments to Safety Laws

Update on changes to WHMIS requirements and transition period

Work Safe Alberta has released an Occupational Health and Safety bulletin to assist Alberta employers and workers understand the impact […]

By Cristina Wendel

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Caselaw Developments
  • COVID-19
  • General
  • Government Safety Investigations
  • International Standards
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Other Safety Developments
  • Prosecutions / Charges
  • Safety – Risk Management
  • Safety Professionals – Practice Issues
  • Violence and Harassment

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site